Full bibliography

Mahuta, R. (1982). Māori Political Representation: A Case for Change. In Maori Representation in Parliament (Vol. 34, pp. 18–27). Hamilton : University of Waikato, Centre for Maori Studies and Research.

Tainui Lands Federation Conference. (1982). Proceedings of Tainui Lands Federation Conference 21-22 August 1982, Waahi Pa, Huntly. Occasional Paper / University of Waikato, Centre for Maori Studies and Research ; (No. 18).

Te Maru, J. E. (with University of Waikato Centre for Maori Studies and Research). (1984). Te hiikoi ki Waitangi: a discussion paper. University of Waikato, Centre for Maaori Studies and Research.

Winiata, M. (2014). The changing role of the leader in Māori society: a study in social change and race relations (M. Fraenkel, Ed.; [New edition].). University of Waikato.

Wilson, I. T. (2020). The Misappropriation of the Haka: Are the Current Legal Protections Around Matauranga Maori in Aotearoa New Zealand Sufficient? Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 51(4), 523–559.

This article analyses the protections the New Zealand intellectual property framework provides for the haka and matauranga Maori. Part II of this article defines the key terms of" misappropriation"," traditional knowledge" and" matauranga Maori" in order for the reader to fully understand these concepts in an indigenous, and specifically Maori, context. Part III of this article discusses the importance and signficance of haka in Maori culture, particularly looking at the history and significance of Ka Mate, the most well-known haka in New Zealand and the world. Examples of different companies, both New Zealand and internationally-owned, using the haka for commercial benefit are analysed to establish whether or not their use of the haka is misappropriation, and if so, the harm this misappropriation has caused Maori. Part IV discusses the current legal protections New Zealand provides for matauranga Maori and whether they sufficiently protect the haka and matauranga Maori generally. It will assess the Haka Ka Mate Attribution Act 2014 as a case study. Part V outlines the limitations of the intellectual framework. Part VI of this article looks to what legal protections would be sufficient to protect against the misappropriation of the haka and matauranga Maori generally.

Kapa-Kingi, E. (2020). Kia Tawharautia Te Matauranga Maori: Decolonising the Intellectual Property Regime in Aotearoa New Zealand. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 51(4), 643–673. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.622434423506623

This article explores ways to decolonise aspects of the intellectual property system in Aotearoa New Zealand, primarily in respect of trade marks. It considers the seminal Wai 262 report of the Waitangi Tribunal and builds upon its findings and recommendations, while also offering new ideas of legal reform for protecting matauranga Maori (Maori knowledge and expertise) from undue exploitation. This article also measures those ideas against the objectives and principles of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), as well as other internationally recognised rights. Essentially, this article maintains that for any mechanism to be effective in recognising and upholding the tino rangatiratanga (unqualified self-determination) of Maori over their own matauranga, that mechanism must be founded upon the principles of tikanga Maori (Maori laws and customs), which is a notion crystallised within the Treaty of Waitangi/Te Tiriti o Waitangi. It must also find its own meaningful place in the law of New Zealand that surrounds us today. It is only in this way that the extractive and thereby oppressive binds of the western intellectual property regime can be unpicked and put aside and the tapu (high status and associated sanctity) of matauranga can be upheld. These words are also an honouring of those who spent countless hours on the Wai 262 report. It is hoped this article gives new and much needed life to the issue of protecting matauranga Maori, which is still as relevant today as it was then. Kei aku rangatira, kei aku tapaeru, kei aku whakaruakaka, tenei e ngakau whakaiti nei (an acknowledgement of all those who took part in Wai 262).

View on search.informit.org

Wilkinson, C., Hikuroa, D., Macfarlane, A., & Hughes, M. (2020). Mātauranga Māori in geomorphology: existing frameworks, case studies, and recommendations for incorporating Indigenous knowledge in Earth science. Earth Surface Dynamics, 8, 595–618. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-8-595-2020

Mixed-method bicultural research in Aotearoa New Zealand, including the weaving of Indigenous and other knowledge, is emerging within many academic disciplines. However, mātauranga Māori (the knowledge, culture, values, and world view of the Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand) and Te Ao Māori (the Māori world) is poorly represented within geomorphological investigations. Here, we review international efforts to include Indigenous knowledge in geologic and geomorphic studies and provide an overview of the current state of mātauranga Māori within research endeavours in Aotearoa New Zealand. We review three theoretical frameworks (i.e. methodologies) for including mātauranga Māori in research projects and three models (i.e. methods) for including Māori values within research. We identify direct benefits to geomorphology and discuss how these frameworks and models can be adapted for use with Indigenous knowledge systems outside of Aotearoa New Zealand. The aim of this review is to encourage geomorphologists around the world to engage with local Indigenous peoples to develop new approaches to geomorphic research. In Aotearoa New Zealand, we hope to inspire geomorphologists to embark on research journeys in genuine partnership with Māori that promote toitū te mātauranga – the enduring protection, promotion and respect of mātauranga Māori.

Read document

Walker, D. P., Ataria, J. M., Hughey, K. F. D., Park, P. T., & Katene, J. P. (2021). Environmental and spatial planning with ngā Atua kaitiaki: A mātauranga Māori framework. New Zealand Geographer, 77(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/nzg.12300

Internationally, Eurocentric hegemonies rooted in coloniality dominate the discourse on environmental wellbeing and sustainable development. Māori frameworks are being used and developed in Aotearoa New Zealand to support bicultural approaches to the management of natural resources and built environments. This paper reports on an Atua (Māori gods and spirits) framework that was found to be valuable as a cultural lens for the co-creation of a toolkit for assessing the wellbeing of indigenous forests. This article provides guidance on the development and application of kaupapa Māori frameworks, particularly Atua frameworks, in wider geographical contexts including urban design and spatial planning.

Read document

Mikaere, A. (2005). Chapter 18: The Treaty of Waitangi and Recognition of Tikanga Māori. In M. Belgrave, M. Kawharu, D. V. Williams, & I. H. Kawharu (Eds.), Waitangi Revisited: Perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi (2nd ed., pp. 330–348). Oxford University Press.

Tapsell, P. (2005). Chapter 15: From the Sideline: Tikanga, Treaty Values and Te Papa. In M. Belgrave, M. Kawharu, D. V. Williams, & I. H. Kawharu (Eds.), Waitangi Revisited: Perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi (2nd ed., pp. 266–281). Oxford University Press.

Solomon, M. (2005). The Wai 262 Claim: A Claim by Māori to Indigenous Flora and Fauna. In M. Belgrave, M. Kawharu, D. V. Williams, & I. H. Kawharu (Eds.), Waitangi Revisited: Perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi (2nd ed., pp. 213–232). Oxford University Press.

Tuuta, E. (2005). Chapter 10: Feast or Famine: Customary Fisheries Management in a Contemporary Tribal Society. In M. Belgrave, M. Kawharu, D. V. Williams, & I. H. Kawharu (Eds.), Waitangi Revisited: Perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi (2nd ed., pp. 168–186). Oxford University Press.

Mutu, M. (2005). Chapter 11: Recovering Fagin’s Ill-Gotten Gains: Settling Ngāti Kahu’s Treaty of Waitangi Claims Against the Crown. In M. Belgrave, M. Kawharu, D. V. Williams, & I. H. Kawharu (Eds.), Waitangi Revisited: Perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi (2nd ed., pp. 187–212). Oxford University Press.

Kāwharu, H. (2005). Orakei. In M. Belgrave, M. Kawharu, D. V. Williams, & I. H. Kawharu (Eds.), Waitangi Revisited: Perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi (2nd ed., pp. 151–167). Oxford University Press.

Kawharu, M. (2005). Chapter 6: Rangatiratanga and Social Policy. In M. Belgrave, M. Kawharu, D. V. Williams, & I. H. Kawharu (Eds.), Waitangi Revisited: Perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi (2nd ed., pp. 105–122). Oxford University Press.

Sullivan, A. (2005). Chapter 7: The Treaty of Waitangi and Social Well-being: Justice, Representation, and Participation. In M. Belgrave, M. Kawharu, D. V. Williams, & I. H. Kawharu (Eds.), Waitangi Revisited: Perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi (2nd ed., pp. 123–135). Oxford University Press.

Durie, M. (2005). Chapter 1: Tino Rangatiratanga. In M. Belgrave, M. Kawharu, D. V. Williams, & I. H. Kawharu (Eds.), Waitangi Revisited: Perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi (2nd ed., pp. 3–19). Oxford University Press.

Bargh, M. (2012). Chapter Thirteen: New Māori Politics 1990s-2000s. In D. Keenan (Ed.), Huia histories of Māori: ngā Tāhuhu Kōrero (pp. 277–296). Huia.

"Collection of 17 essays from Māori scholars which cover customary law, ancestral law, the natural world, Māori urban protest, health, politics, and customary language and expression."

Taonui, R. (2012). Māori Urban Protest Movements. In D. Keenan (Ed.), Huia histories of Māori: ngā Tāhuhu Kōrero (pp. 229–260). Huia.

"Collection of 17 essays from Māori scholars which cover customary law, ancestral law, the natural world, Māori urban protest, health, politics, and customary language and expression."

Brierley, G. J., Hikuroa, D., Fuller, I. C., Tunnicliffe, J., Allen, K., Brasington, J., Friedrich, H., Hoyle, J., & Measures, R. (2022). Reanimating the strangled rivers of Aotearoa New Zealand. WIREs Water. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1624

Contemporary management practices have artificially confined (strangled) river systems in Aotearoa New Zealand to support intensified land use in riparian areas. These practices work against nature, diminishing the functionality and biodiversity values of living rivers, and associated socio-cultural relations with rivers. River confinement can accentuate flood risk by promoting development in vulnerable locations and limiting the flexibility to adapt to changing climate, prospectively accentuating future disasters. To date, uptake of space-to-move management interventions that seek to address such shortcomings is yet to happen in Aotearoa New Zealand. This is despite the fact that such practices directly align with Māori (indigenous) conceptualizations of rivers as indivisible, living entities. Treaty of Waitangi obligations that assert Māori rights alongside colonial rights of a settler society provide an additional driver for uptake of space-to-move initiatives. This article outlines a biophysical prioritization framework to support the development and roll out of space-to-move interventions in ways that work with the character, behavior, condition, and evolutionary trajectory (recovery potential) of each river system in Aotearoa. This article is categorized under: Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness Science of Water > Water and Environmental Change

Read document

Search

Full bibliography 690 resources

Explore

Categories

Resource type

Publication year